• Home
  • IFAD website
  • Subscribe to posts
  • Subscribe to comments
Showing posts with label apr09. Show all posts
Showing posts with label apr09. Show all posts

More on Romeo and Juliet

Posted by Allison Hewlitt Tuesday, March 10, 2009 0 comments

For those who missed out at the APR but heard about the 'Romeo and Juliet' session, you can get a better session of the offerings that Romeo Grant and Juliet Loan had to give each other in this short video clip.

Country Team Meeting: Mongolia

Posted by Ariko ありこ Monday, March 9, 2009 1 comments

On going RPRP is planned to be completed before the completion date. All available funding has been budgeted to be utilised within this year. This year, project effort will focus on project completion process especially on KM and CPR. ENRAP will support KM and communication officers financially and technically through out the year.
M&E support was provided by China country team member early this year. Input focussed on logframe and completion survey. Follow up input will be provided towards latter half of the year.
Supervision mission will focus on the project completion process, including SA reconciliation, completion survey, PCR, KM process. It is planned to coincide with inter Aimag meeting. Supervision mission by cluster CPO's is being discussed, providing opportunity for cross fertilisation within country cluster.
Rural Finance Component has been most problematic component, in terms of out reach and group lending. Discussion was held with APRACA in order to receive their input to the programme. CPM will support PSU in following up with participating banks.

Newly proposed Natural Resource Management Imitative builds up on one of the activities undertaken by RPRP. RPRP will provide input and support during design. Regarding the MARPP project, RPRP will implement pilot projects in 3 aimags. It is envisaged that learning from these pilot project will also be taken into the finalisation of MARPP design.

Country Team Meeting: Maldives

Posted by Ariko ありこ 0 comments

Ongoing Post Tsunami project is establishing foundation for project implementation. IFAD CPM will closely follow the process and provide necessary support.
(1) The project is currently recruiting M&E consultant to establish M&E system. CPM will request the regional RBM officer to backstop M&E consultant from HQ. A short input from Philippines CPO will be provided in late May.
(2) The project is preparing for the first withdrawal application. CPM will liaise with the project closely and provide necessary support.
(3) MTR for the project starts from 21st March. During this MTR, re-designing of components, reallocation and cancellation of fund will be decided.

The new project FADiP is awaiting for effectiveness. Current effectiveness deadline is 15th April. If the government successful meets effectiveness conditions, start up workshop shall be conducted either in June or July. During the workshop phase, loan administration and M&E training will be conducted for both projects and government staff.

The main issue of Maldives Country Programme is severe lack of local capacity for project implementation. CPM will provide information on trainings by other IFAD country teams in the sub-region.

The link below brings you to an interview of Thomas Rath on climate change with tasty social flavor added by Mattia...

http://blip.tv/file/1850651

APR closing comments by Thomas Elhaut

Posted by lucielamour Friday, March 6, 2009 2 comments

The APR was brought to a close by Thomas Elhaut, who promised free massages to those who would listen to his speech :-)

Instead of summarizing the APR, Thomas highlighted what he felt were the main points of change that IFAD needs to act upon:

  • Agriculture is back on the agenda: we have to do it much better this time around in the context of a food /financial crisis and the key agricultural productivity and research
  • Direct supervision: we are aiming for improved administration and shorter turnaround. Many projects are at risk, so we need to help each other. We have to move towards implementation support - facilitation, mutual accountability and support each other's learning. We heard good ideas to improve DS, such as through peer reviews, reviewing the timing of missions and empowering missions through their composition (involvement of government,grant managers and local stakeholders)
  • Grants in country progammes: we have limited resources so let's use them strategically. They are a foundation for KM and we are underexploiting that. We need stronger linkages; loans have to be greared to grants at the project design stage...why wait for marriage? (as Tung put it ;-))
  • KM: we made big progress in demystifying KM. We now know that KM is about learning and sharing, keeping it simple and innovating, with support from others, giving a shoulder to cry on. We need to be selective in what we do around KM, be evidence-based, resist standarizing and be gender/culture sensitive. ENRAP helps with this, bringing together people face-to-face and with technology; EMachina will help us with technology in the next phase. Remember that IFAD's identity is rural poverty reduction and innovation. Cassandra and her team will share this with the rest of the world
  • Managing country programmes for results: need to have simplicity and clarity. The starting point is the log frame but we need to have clarity of objective, to decide where you want to go before you try to get there. Monitoring and evaluation is a management tool; be selective, simple and concrete, collect what you need, need what you collect. We have to mainstream further by identifiyng M & E resource people in country
  • Financial: we have improved procurement but we still have some way to go. We will organize procurement trainings, but also trainings on fraud and corruption. We plan to organize a financial event with aid agencies and finance ministries to look at trying to find funds for KM and to simplify procedures. We will have more money to address global issues next year but we know that you are already confronting them on a day-to-day basis and are finding solutions for those constraints
  • Productivity issues: we need to have more talks about it... this was the first time we sat down with John Skerritt
  • Climate change: need to desgn with more flexibility, have coping strategies, policy responses and earmark funds for women to deal with climate change
  • Sustainability: it is the other side of climate change and the food crisis, the economic and social dimension. There needs to be ownership of the identity agenda at the project design and keep it on the radar throughout
  • Private sector: it is an important player, we have to start working with them as partners. We want to bring them along at the next APR meeting so we will be doing some prep work
  • Knowledge market: it was remarkable, many thanks to all for sharing about your work
  • Blog: I want to see the results from the exercice on country team work reported on blog. What are you going to do? I would love to see 2-3 changes as consequence of this workshop. Let's keep the blog alive, as least until the next workshop

Thomas hoped that we will be inspired and committed to take on all of the above so we have a better record next year. In closing, he thanked Chase and Martina (who had already thanked everyone else), wished us good field trips and bon voyage, until next year!

VietNam country action plan

Posted by lucielamour 0 comments

General action points:
  1. IFAD - Project - Government supervision missions should ensure that terms of reference are sent well in advance;
  2. The Provincial People's Committee should be informed of the Mission and requested participation, particularly to participate in the field visits;
  3. Ministry of Planning (MPI) and Investment and MoF should participate in the missions;
  4. Provincial wrap up meetings would be help at the end of each supervision mission;
  5. One national level workshop (country programme review) bringing together the findings of the supervision missions would be sufficient in Hanoi chaired by the MPI;
  6. Follow up missions would be made based on request; and
  7. Capacity needs to be built of the project M&E teams to develop M&E systems and analysis of data.

The following specific plan was discussed and timeline agreed upon with the Project Directors:

Supervision Missions:
  • 9 March - 17 March - travel to Tuyen Quang, RIDP Supervision Mission
  • 30 March - 9 April - travel to Ha Giang, DPPR Supervision Mission
  • 12 April - 21 April - travel to Quang Binh DPPR Supervision Mission
  • 26 - 29 April - travel to Bac Kan province, Start up workshop for the 3PAD
  • 1 May - 10 May - travel to Ha Tinh IMPP Supervision Mission
  • 12 May - 22 May - travel to Tra Vinh IMPP Supervision Mission
  • 25 May - 2 June - travel to Ben Tre DBRP Supervision Mission
  • 8 June - 17 June - travel to Cao Bang DBRP Supervision Mission

M&E:
  • 20 - 24 April - M&E Mission in Bac Kan province
  • September - M&E follow up mission to build the capacity of the M&E units

Knowledge Management Events:
  • Mid July - IFAD provinces Pro-Poor Commodities Trade Fair in Ha Tinh province
  • August - Country Programme Review
  • 1st day - performance evaluation from MPI
  • 2nd day - project status evaluation IFAD
  • Mid October -Field immersion (Ha Tinh, Quang Binh, Tra Vinh, Ben Tre)
  • 1st week of December - Knowledge Management Fair
  • 1st day - media event and knowledge sharing
  • 2nd day - Provincial People's Committee day

Video thumbnail. Click to play
The six-minute APR workshop summary video has been uploaded onto blip.tv and can be viewed/downloaded. Hope it brings you good memory of those fond moments at the workshop.

Click To Play


The IFAD Philippines CPMT looks forward to a more results-based and effective implementation of its projects in the country. There are two main focus areas of the country team’s plan for 2009:
  1. improving knowledge management; and

  2. enhancing the capacity of project management.

In knowledge management, the country team wants to adopt and/or improve appropriate processes for Creating, Capturing, Communicating and Carrying Out knowledge and best practices with the help and active participation of the members of the country programme management team and its development partners, as well as of concerned stakeholders within the country and beyond. In project management, the focus will be on building the capacity of the staff of the ongoing programmes and projects, with special emphasis on the areas of Monitoring and Evaluation, Procurement, and Financial Management. During the year the following key activities under these two headings will be carried out:

  • In the area of improving Knowledge Management: (a) establish a Knowledge Bank of Good Practices; (b) publish two IFAD-Philippines Special Newsletter Issues; (c) set-up a national website; (d) conduct the 3rd Knowledge and Learning Market; and (e) identify and train Knowledge Management champions for better knowledge sharing.

  • In the area of improving Project Management Capacity: (a) hold a focused annual country programme review with special attention on Monitoring and Evaluation, Financial Management, and Procurement; (b) facilitate loan administration and financial management training with the help of carefully selected specialists; (c) facilitate the cross visit of staff from the NMCIREMP to IFAD project(s) in the Asia and the Pacific region's portfolio; and (c) enable the staff of all projects and programmes to participate in the APMAS training, once funds under that grant are released.

The Sri Lankan Country Team Work

Posted by Anura Wednesday, March 4, 2009 0 comments

We have discussed the common work for all three projects - Tsunami project, dry zone project and the plantation project. The following are our major common events in 2009 where all the projects and some government participants will participate:

  1. M&E and RIMS training programme is planned to be held in end of March. Lando and Susan will help us as the resource persons. All three projects are very enthusiastic about the workshop, may be after the APR. This is a 2 and 1/2 day residential workshop. The objective is to prepare the M&E plan with M&E indicators and identify RIMS indicators. The individual projects will finance their cost and IFAD will fiance the resources persons cots from a SIS budget. This is a novel way of having joint funding to conduct a training workshop.
  2. FAO and the World Bank with the Dry Zone project participation is organising a workshop to bring the producers, processors and traders to initiate a value chain for the project participants. The cost of the 2-day residential workshop is funded by FAO and the WB is facilitating it. IFAD project is benefiting by getting their participants to learn about processing and value addition.
  3. The Start-up workshop for the SPEnDP is scheduled for the end of March 2009. This is again a 2-day residential workshop and the total cost will come from IFAD. Although it is late we are finally getting all partners together to have this workshop.
  4. The first stakeholder workshop will be held in April to share the COSOP formulation process with the key stakeholders. This will be a residential 2-day workshop with the participation of the IFAD and GOSL key officials including the private sector.
  5. A 2-day workshop will be held in the 1st week of June to discuss the initial steps of Knowledge management strategy for Sri Lanka. The Tsunami project National Coordinator very kindly agreed to organise the workshop which will be fully financed by either IFAD or ENRAP or both. Shalini will guide us and also Chase will give us the top level guidance. The out come expected is the ingredient to formulate the KM strategy and some concrete actions.
  6. There will be Loan Admin Training Workshop for all the three project participants. This will be a 4-day workshop fully financed by IFAD and Neomi is to be contacted as the resources person.
  7. The first Country Portfolio Review workshop will be held in September. This will be a 3-4 day workshop with full participation of all the project and project lead agencies. The Dry Zone Project Coordinator kindly agree to organise the workshop and the full cost will be born b IFAD.
  8. In addition to these common work the following implementation support and supervision Maison (ISS) are planed: (a) Light mission for PTCRrMP in March; (b) Design mission for the NADeP in May; (c) Mid-term Review Mission for DZLisPP in June; (d) Light mission for SPEnDP in July; (e) 1st ISS mission for the Grant project for Anuadhaura Rural Foundation in August; (f) Full ISS for PTCRrEMP in September; and (g) full ISS for SPEnDP in December.


The China country team reviewed the achievements of last year’s action plan and acknowledged that last year plan was a bit ambitious, as result about 50% target was achieved. This was also due to the fact that the government focal agency would ultimately need to be consulted and not all actions were fully endorsed. This year’s plan was made with PMOs but also with leadership given by the government representative. The focus will be on improving knowledge management and project implementation quality:

Knowledge management

  • Strengthen knowledge collection and dissemination in project management.
  • Increase awareness of KM
  • Diversify the composition of the direct supervision mission.
  • Enhance the role of ENRAP website (system upgrading and enlarge the number of users)
  • Improve South-South cooperation in aspect of KM

Project management
  • Develop a comprehensive set of M&E operation guidelines and tools (RIMS)
  • Activities supporting project sustainability such as case study and ensuring maintenance of project investment etc.
  • Conduct joint project review (IFAD, MOF and PMO should participate)

In light of the discussions of the PI Annual Performance Review workshop, the Pakistan country team has fine tuned the country programme AWPB for the following 5 key areas:

1. Managing for results
Project level

  • All projects to focus more on RIMS, with more regular / consistent reporting on RIMS indicators
  • Project management to have contingent plan for ensuring continuity in occasions when M&E officers are transferred
  • PPAF to organise 6-monthly review meetings with POs on results of MIOP & PRISM
Country programme level
  • To strengthen capacity of country office to back up / assist projects on M&E in general and RIMS in particular

Generic recommendation: IFAD to provide projects with continuous refresh courses on RIMS

2. Knowledge management (KM)
Project level
  • Projects to host 1 KM workshop to operationalize country programme KM strategy / action plan, with support of KM facilitator
  • PPAF-managed projects to: (a) standardise MIS system / software for POs; & (b) have a greater focus on reporting good practices under PPAF-supported activities, e.g., IT-based monitoring (used by CMDO)
Country programme level
  • To develop a country programme KM strategy & action plan
  • To organize at least one KM workshop with participation of main stakeholders

3. Sustainability
Project level

  • All projects to focus more on CO sustainability
  • All projects to focus more on supporting union-level legally-registered apex bodies (for ensuring linkage with government institutions and services)
Country programme level
  • Supervision / implementation support missions to pay particular attention to sustainability
  • To update & expand the use of the “Institutional Maturity Index” (currently used by AJK CDP)
  • To explore PPAF collaboration in dealing with NADP sustainability (in addition to the planned small country grant)

4. Innovation
Project level
  • Projects to visit PPAF to explore possibility of replicating innovative practices such as IT-based monitoring
  • AJK CDP and PPAF-implemented projects to reinforce implementation of the “innovation” component under these projects

5. Loan/grant linkage
Country programme level
  • To ensure small country grants are linked with, and/or enhance, loan project(s)
  • To facilitate EAD/ENRAP cooperation in M&E capacity-building
  • To include grant projects in country portfolio review meetings

Co-financing Session:

Posted by Ayurzana Puntsagdavaa 0 comments

Recorded by Sana F. K. JATTA and Ayurzana Puntsagdavaa

The lunch session on co-financing was held on 4 March 2009 with the following purposes:

  • to reflect on experiences of project and programme managers of IFAD-assisted projects in the Asia and the Pacific region on co-financing and;
  • to extract lessons learnt to help improve partnership frameworks in the future.
There were 30 participants in the session including the project managers and country presence officers from Bangladesh, Cambodia, India, Indonesia, Laos, Philippines, Sri Lanka, and VietNam. In addition, there were ten IFAD staff, plus representatives from partners such as WFP, UNDP and SEARCA.

To set the scene for discussion the following facts were shared with the participants. Out of IFAD-assisted 52 projects in 2008, 27 projects were co-financed (23 were IFAD-initiated and co-financed by others; 4 were other institution-initiated and co-financed by IFAD). IFAD's corporate target for co-financing is to achieve a ratio of 1:1, of which 30% should be IFAD co-financing other donor funded projects, leaving 70% of IFAD projects having to seek to mobilize co-financing from others.

During the animated discussion the following key points were raised by project directors / managers:
  • Co-financing promised during design sometimes did not materialize;
  • Even where co-financing promised during design did end up materializing, they sometimes were on terms and conditions different from those agreed;
  • Lack of synchronization of resources mobilized by co-financiers;
  • Complexity of resource mobilisation, especially when many co-financiers fund 1 specific activity or component;
  • Managing different co-financiers demands a lot of time from project directors / managers;
  • Donors demand co-financing sometimes for their own internal corporate requirements rather than that of borrowing governments;
  • Sometimes mobilization of Government counterpart funds pose such a hassle for project directors that they are forced to use donor’s funds, which subsequently creates accountability problems and problems with withdrawal applications; and
  • Lack of harmonization of strategic objectives and operational procedures of donors poses difficulties during implementation.

Some of the key recommendations that emerged from the discussions were the following:
  • Co-financing agreements should be completed, finalized and well documented prior to submission to the Executive Board of IFAD;
  • Programme design should build in sufficient flexibility such that lack of co-financing resources during implementation will not have a major impact on the whole project;
  • Avoid many co-financiers funding the same component where possible;
  • Different cofinanciers should be assigned different geographic area or component or activity to fund such that each could be self contained;
  • Target co-financing of different programme activities based on comparative advantages of individual co-financiers with the hope of managing or capitalizing on knowledge they have and on their corporate comfort levels;
  • Carefully selecting cofinanciers can be very useful e.g. in debt-swaps; and
  • When mobilizing co-financing ensure that co-financiers explain clearly their procedures for mobilizing their funds to ensure project managers know exactly what they have to do from the beginning of the project.


Please find the action plans of the country programmes for Cambodia and Indonesia. YQ

After discussion in small groups, participants shared their thoughts and views on what stood out most for them during the APR and what might they do differently as a result. Here are some of their responses.

What stood out for you?
  • "How the workshop proceedings were captured."
  • "Discussions on sustainability, M&E and KM which will be a highlight in our 2009 work."
  • "We have a human network"
  • "The effectiveness and facilitation of the programme"
  • "Everything was on time. The mix of modalities. No session was boring."
  • "It was really nice to have participated in this workshop and to have met the project directors... I now actually see their faces."
  • "Thomas Elhaut responded to sessions."
What might you do differently as a result?
  • "Integrate components addressing climate change challenges within our projects"
  • "Use some of the different methodologies to conduct our own meetings"
  • "Based on the discussion on direct supervision...  finally for the first time, I realised that after one year experience, our relationship with our projects has really changed... it has become more intensive in terms of partnerships and content of the discussion. It has changed dramatically for the better."
  • "Sustainability of implementing our programs."
  • "Get more in touch. I have heard about projects and activities happening in the Philippines. I take my responsibility to have more information on them."
  • "Knowledge Fair in our country."
  • "Integrate KM in country."
What stood out for you? What might you do differently?

Nepal Country Team Meeting

Posted by Ron Hartman 0 comments


A meeting of the Nepal Country Team was held in the context of the APR workshop in Bangkok.

The Nepal team (with a special guest from the Pacific Islands) reviewed potential for improving the role and focus of the CPMT concept with an objective making this a more useful mechanism for managing knowledge, improving performance and enhancing policy linkage.

The main agreements coming from this meeting are as follows:

Objectives and Focus of CPMT
The objectives for the CPMT would be sharing of knowledge to improve performance and policy influence.

It was agreed that the in-country CPMT would be more effective in achieving these objectives if the participation remained small and focused. Where appropriate, additional stakeholders will be included (for instance during design, supervision, COSOP review processes etc...)

It was agreed that the CPMT will not be "Rome" driven or dependant. It was further agreed that the annual COSOP review process will be integrated within the Government system with other development partners in Nepal.

Composition
It was agreed that the a "core" CPMT consisting of Project Directors, Grant Coordinators, Key Line agency and Ministry Officials and IFAD staff will be formed.

Frequency
The core CPMT will meet systematically on a trimester basis to align with national planning processes. Meetings/ events will be held each year during the 3rd week of December, last week of April and last week of August. The December meeting will be considered an annual meeting and be larger in participation coinciding with the Annual Cosop review. Training side events will be held around the fringes of the August CPMT session.

The first meeting will be held in April 2009.

Thematic Focus
Suggestions for initial issues and themes for discussion during the CPMT range from micro finance, M&E, gender, climate change and ecosystem services, and KM.

Country Team meeting held on day 3 of the workshop.

Present: Nigel Brett, Hashib Alam, Niaz Apu, Sheikh Mohsin, Jebun Naher, Khalil Rahman, Fazlul Kader, Abdur Razzaque, Shankar Kutty, Chase Palmeri, Mel Posadas.

Minutes as follows.

1. Design:

PSSWDP: Appraisal of PSSWDP in March 2009, EB presentation in September 2009. Effectiveness in early 2010.
New projects: 3 concepts for future projects currently under review by IFAD. Most likely that an inception will take place in May 2009 for an integrated coastal zone project in partnership with Netherlands.

2. Supervision:

Direct supervision of MFTSP (Oct), MFMSFP (Oct), FEDEC (Nov), SCBRMP (Jan), MIDPCR (March).
World Bank supervision of NATP (Jan).
Main supervision agenda for 2009 - improvement in financial management and procurement, KM and impact.

3. C0untry Grants

New IFAD country grants to Bangladesh include a grant to research arsenic contamination in crops and livestock, and a grant to research saline tolerance in rice in coastal areas to mitigate for climate change. Both grants will have a start-up workshop in 2009 and are being managed by IRRI Dhaka Office.

4. IFAD President visit:

Possibility of a visit by IFAD's new President to Bangladesh in 2009. Such a visit is not yet confirmed, but if it goes ahead it could include field visits to see microfinance groups and mini hatcheries in MFTSP, or microfinance for farmers in MFMSFP. Other possibilities could be LCS groups in MIDPCR, or fishing groups in SCBRMP.

5. KM agenda in 2009

Apu is now in-country KM facilitator.
Monthly KM meetings for country programme network, chaired by Apu.
6 monthly portfolio review meetings chaired by CPM.
Maintenance of BD page on IFAD poverty portal.
2 six monthly newsletters.
2 bangla editions of the newsletter.
Identification of agenda for documentation by projects through supervision missions.
ENRAP follow-up events - possibly refresher write-shop.

6. Procurement agenda in 2009.

Major improvements are needed in procurement management in the country programme. Activities that will be supported include:

  • training of project staff in procurement by Sudhir (focus on FEDEC, SCBRMP)
  • training of project staff and also district level staff in procurement by Amar Mishra and/or Sudhir (focus on MIDPCR).
  • specific training in community procurement and waterbody development procurement is needed in SCBRMP.
  • big increase in lead time for procurement - IFAD will be alerted at least 3 months in advance of any prior review - to avoid last minute rushes and delays.
  • any corrections in data sheets that are not recorded in opening sheets will be automatically be re-tendered.
  • in the case of MIDPCR, Amar will review the documents in-country for all cases of IFAD prior review(as opposed to sending full sets to IFAD) in view of the huge bulk of documentation involved. Amar should review financial capacity, technical capability, past experience for responsive bids. Amar will then inform Shankar of the outcome of the reviews. The only docs that are sent to IFAD in these cases are the 5 page evaluations.
  • However for any case of over USD 100,000 all docs should to be sent to Shankar in IFAD for all phases of procurement review.
  • LGED will send a letter to IFAD outlining the process of procurement at district level and pointing out that only the top 3 responsive bids are sent from the District to LGED HQ.
  • In SCBRMP, in cases where there are discrepencies between IFAD and GOB procurement guidelines, the project should follow IFAD guidelines.
  • In the case of SCBRMP - advance payment of LCS women is ok.
  • In the case of SCBRMP - while any splitting of lots for roads is in line with the Govt guidelines under certain circumstances, IFAD require expanations from the PD for all these cases.
  • In SCBRMP, it was explained that in remote areas, only 5 contractors are present, and that this automatically leads to the same companies bidding for the large number of roads that are financed.
  • IFAD will not approve any cases where works begin before contracts are signed.

7. Other training needs in 2009
  • TOT training by Dewan Alamgir is needed for FEDEC - 3 batches in 2009.
  • Refresher results based AWPB training is needed - Maria Donnat will be approached to see if this is feasible.
  • IFAD format for results based AWPB will be provided to the new PD of NATP.

8. IT support in 2009
  • Software adaptation for Dhan Foundation for SCBRMP.
  • FM software adaptation for MIDPCR

Thomas Elhaut tells us about the three things that he has observed so far:

video

Even the roaring success of the market led ‘Siale LIVE' talk show and the Knowledge Market of yesterday, could not stop the ‘Power Point’ from striking back with a vengeance. The alarm bells clanged loudly on how climate change is affecting all of us and this was more serious for the poorest for whom we all are working in a small way. While the coping mechanisms and

adaptive strategies were churned it was an ideal setting for the following session on ‘Sustainability’ and the key challenges that we all face during project implementation.

The joint presentations of Qaim from Pakistan, Jebun from Bangladesh and Dalai from Mongolia gave the following messages:

  • Sustainability is continuation of benefits after project closure.
  • It is more about results i.e. impacts and outcomes.
  • It implies environmental, social, economic and Institutional Sustainability.
  • Social Sustainability is achieved when social mobilization is a means and not an end.
  • Economic activities promoted by projects must be sustainable.
  • Mainstream interventions to achieve Institutional sustainability.
  • Poor sustainability could be a result of both design and implementation.
  • Exit strategy must be a part of the design process
  • Have mainstream organizations as implementing partners rather than Units which exist only for the life cycle. Institutional ownership is the key.
  • Governments replicate and upscale successful project interventions.
  • Local Institutions and communities promoted by the project must be supported by the Government.
  • Quality of social mobilization is very important and needs to be focused upon.

Richard Caldwell from TANGO International shared the results of a desk review in his presentation based on the field studies carried out by them in Philippines, Lao PDR, Vietnam and India on sustainability in IFAD projects:

  • Sustainability is multidimensional.
  • Functional Institutions that are self sustaining - key to Institutional sustainability.
  • Environmental sustainability is achieved when production systems support livelihoods and maintain a stable resource base.
  • Sustainability can be fostered either if it is market drive development or anchored in the communities that focuses on empowerment.
  • Sustainability is correlated to how much of the project design has considered national policies, PRSs and capacities of local organizations.
  • It is proportional to the amount of contact project ahs with the communities
  • Risk analysis and management important tools.
  • Have a sustainability strategy rather than an exit strategy.
  • A strong country presence is an important factor in sustainability.
  • Sustainability should be focused upon during project supervision.

Some of the elements that have emerged based on some successful projects that have proved sustainable in the region are:

  • Sustainability starts at the design stage,
  • it should involves communities,
  • builds capacities of communities in the initial stages,
  • is participatory,
  • uses the mentoring approach
  • Empowers communities
  • Focus on economic transformation and income diversification
  • Do not rush to create outputs
  • Activities should be based on community priorities and;
  • Design modifications as necessary during project life.

The views that emerged during the discussion that followed included:

  • Real picture of sustainability would emerge only if we carry out a post evaluation of projects after 10-12 years of closure.
  • Strong institutions left behind by the project constitute key elements of sustainability.
  • Strong economic foundations and market linkages important factor for sustainability.
  • Build on existing local community organizations and Implementing systems for ensuring sustainability of interventions.
  • A well defined exit strategy ensures sustainability

The crux of the session was that the efficacy of our work is maximized and relevant only when it is sustainable and this issue must be tackled from the beginning of the project life cycle in a systematic manner with a clear strategy. Sustainability of interventions is best achieved when the project interventions and models are replicated (and cloned in some cases); up scaled and owned by local Governments / existing Institutions are market driven and anchored in the communities.

Our moderator, Djadi Purnomo of Indonesia, deserves all credit for moderating a challenging session on challenges, and Thanks to Allison for clicking those lovely photos - some from realy challenging angles.




In Wednesday's morning session, Dhrupad Choudhury, Coordinator of the Sustainable Livelihoods and Poverty Reduction Programme stressed the importance of learning from and strengthening community adaptation measures to climate change.

Check out the link to the video below:

Reality Check

Posted by Chase Palmeri 0 comments



Facilitator and Event Organiser look pleased with the results so far!!!!