• Home
  • IFAD website
  • Subscribe to posts
  • Subscribe to comments

Proyecto Paraguay Inclusivo

Posted by Greg Benchwick Wednesday, April 11, 2012 0 comments

Junta Ejecutiva del FIDA aprueba nuevo préstamo para proyecto de US$25.8 millones para el desarrollo rural en Paraguay
Proyecto Paraguay Inclusivo busca disminuir la pobreza extrema y fortalecer las economías rurales


La Junta Ejecutiva del Fondo Internacional de Desarrollo Agrícola (FIDA) aprobó en su reunión de abril un nuevo proyecto de 25.8 millones de dólares estadounidenses para la reducción de la pobreza en Paraguay y el fortalecimiento de las economías rurales.

El Proyecto de Inclusión de la Agricultura Familiar en las Cadenas de Valor (Paraguay Inclusivo), llegará a más de 70 000 personas pobres en la zona este del país, y generará beneficios indirectos para 50 000 personas más.

“El objetivo principal del proyecto es la creación de alianzas público-privadas que facilitarán a las organizaciones de los pequeños agricultores un mejor acceso a asistencia técnica especializada y al mercado de finanza rural, y un acceso preferencial a los mercados de venta a través de las agro-industrias. De esta manera se mejorará la condición de vida y la seguridad alimentaria para los beneficiarios del proyecto”, afirmó Paolo Silveri, Gerente de Programa de País del FIDA en Paraguay. El proyecto pretende también generar 8 000 nuevos puestos de trabajo.

Paraguay es un país de ingresos medios y su economía creció 14,5 por ciento en 2010. Sin embargo, en el campo paraguayo 1,3 millones son pobres y aproximadamente 60 por ciento de este grupo son considerados extremadamente pobres. Los pueblos indígenas tienen una tasa de mortalidad tres veces más alta que el promedio nacional, mientras que la malnutrición infantil en estas comunidades es dos veces más alta que el promedio nacional. El Proyecto Paraguay Inclusivo dispondrá también de un fondo de micro-capitalización para pueblos originarios y otras comunidades que viven en condición de pobreza extrema.

“Los factores principales en la pobreza rural en Paraguay son la dificultad de acceso a mercados y al crédito, el deterioro de los recursos naturales, la escasez de organizaciones sociales, activos productivos y tecnologías, y la falta de acceso a tierras rentables y servicios públicos”, afirmó Silveri. “El Proyecto Paraguay Inclusivo apunta a generar alianzas que remuevan esos obstáculos de acceso para más de 14 000 familias campesinas pobres”.

El proyecto de cinco años será ejecutado por el Ministerio de Agricultura de Paraguay. Una contribución financiera de 10 millones de dólares estadounidenses viene del FIDA, con 3,5 millones de dólares estadounidenses en contrapartida nacional y 12,3 millones de dólares estadounidenses del sector privado y de los beneficiarios del proyecto.

Map it!






Share it!
  









This week from 3-4 April I had the opportunity to join thirty-one selected individuals from Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Palestine, Sudan, Syria and Yemen who met in Cairo to discuss the sustainability of networking activities in the Near East and North Africa region. At the crossroads between East and West, networking is nothing new in the region. The exchange of goods, technology and ideas between cultures has been going on for centuries. But starting in 2005, IFAD and the International Centre for Rural Development, (IDRC) joined hands to use networking to improve the performance of their agriculture and rural development projects in a programme called the Knowledge Access in Rural Interconnected Areas Network, or KariaNet. The KariaNet approach, including collaborative research and capacity building, takes a page from a similar initiative between IFAD and IDRC in Asia and the Pacific called Knowledge Networking for Rual Asia/Pacific, or ENRAP.


But KariaNet, like ENRAP, is a development project. And stakeholders have been clear from the start that the external investments projects bring won’t last forever. So this week’s meeting focussed on what to do when this external financing comes to an end in 2013. To focus on this topic KariaNet commissioned a study by specialists in the field of networking and knowledge sharing, Heather Creech from the International Institute for Sustainable Development and Ziad Moussa from the American University of Beirut to look at the options for KariaNet’s future.


Stakeholders at the workshop were asked to evaluate the options set out in the study and come to a consensus about what they want to do between now late 2013 to secure future collaboration. While the study was referred to as the Devolution Study, what clearly captured the imagination of the network was not the devolution of network management and support responsibilities but rather the evolution of knowledge sharing and networking.


Virtually unanimous in their determination to carry on and improve knowledge sharing – irrespective of financial support they may or not receive from IDRC and IFAD in the future - the group concluded that what made sense to them was to focus on networking at the national level. Interestingly, this fit with the conclusions of the IFAD evaluation of ENRAP after Phase II and led IFAD to design ENRAP’s final phase focussing its support on improved networking amongst IFAD country programme partners.


As much as KariaNet participants are thirsty for new ideas from abroad, their priority is to build on the immediate benefits already experienced from knowledge sharing with colleagues working in the same agro-ecosystems with similar means of production, speaking the same language, and collaborating with the same ministries. In the ideal scenario they would also like to link to one another through an international or regional organisation to serve as a secretariat.


Though not discussed, it is interesting to note that results framework of the IFAD Strategy for Knowledge Management calls for just such participant driven regional networks, integrated with IFAD’s IT platform and linked to other thematic networks. In the region, KariaNet participants are themselves already linked or members of thematic networks like the Virtual Extension and Research Communication Network (VERCON) hosted by FAO or groups like the Association of Agricultural Research Institutes in Near East and North Africa (AARANINA).


In the implementation of the KariaNet and ENRAP programmes, IDRC has helped stakeholders to test and document a range of approaches to knowledge sharing through both capacity building and network facilitation. Over the years innovations introduced have ranged from participatory mapping, to writeshops, videography, systematisation, online discussion groups, learning alliances and learning routes. KS/KM amongst partners that have been mobilised by IDRC and IFAD in these efforts have included ICIMOD, FAO, ILEIA, ICARDA, and PROCASUR. Some are also working with IFAD stakeholders in Africa and Latin America. As networking and knowledge sharing improve within both regions, network members will be better able to share across regions.


Thanks to the initiative taken by Elaine Reinke at IFAD and her colleagues Hammou Laamrani and Layal Dandache at IDRC we could compare notes on past experiences between the two networks. An unintended outcome, was that by sharing experiences we were building the kinds of relationships and trust that makes a foundation for future networking between the networks. Connecting regional networks to make up a global community of networks amongst IFAD stakeholders once seemed quite remote. The prospects of that happening have just improved.

Climate-smart agriculture: Not just for big farms anymore

Posted by Roxanna Samii Wednesday, April 4, 2012 1 comments


by President Paul Kagame and Kanayo F. Nwanze

Without the support of the world's small farmers, climate talks such as those set for the Rio+20 Summit can never translate fully into climate action, This is why, as the focus shifts to building a global green economy, Governments, other policymakers and the business community from developed as well as emerging economies must recognize the inextricable linkages between climate change, the environment and food security – and, critically, bring smallholder agriculture into discussion.

Every day, smallholder farmers in developing countries confront the real world consequences of climate change and are often first to fall prey to fickle global markets or increasingly extreme weather events.

Yet smallholders cannot be ignored when it comes to climate change solutions:  the world’s half billion small farms  provide up to 80 percent of the food in  in sub-Saharan Africa and parts of Asia.

Can we really count on these farmers, many of them desperately poor, to take a leading role in addressing the twin challenges of food security and environmental sustainability?  Can they produce more food while protecting the natural environment?

We believe the answer is a resounding yes.  Real world experience shows that they can.

Critical to success is adopting environmentally sustainable techniques that preserve and enhance the soil and ground water.

Examples include terracing to prevent soil loss and degradation through erosion and flooding; minimal or zero tillage, crop rotation and the application of manure, compost or mulching, to improve soil structure and fertility; and agro forestry systems that integrate trees with crops and livestock to produce more in sustainable ways.

The recent experience in Rwanda signals hope that increased agricultural output and environmental protection really can go hand-in-hand.

In Ngororero district in the country's southwest, for  example, an IFAD-backed project has seen Rwandan farmers increase crop yields by up to 300 per cent through improved methods, including using better seeds, good planting technologies and applying fertilizer at the optimal time.

On a larger scale, farmers across Rwanda are increasing the use of manure instead of chemical fertilizers that produce greenhouse gases. In some areas of the country, smallholders are now terracing their land and using other natural techniques to improve the water-holding potential of the soil, improving soil quality and increasing their output.

And while these approaches have proliferated during the past five years, Rwanda has quadrupled its agricultural production.  Today it is now a food-secure nation – remarkable progress in just a few years.

Importantly, Rwanda’s efforts to promote climate-smart agriculture are supported by a wider policy and investment framework that seeks to ensure that every farmer, however small, has access to improved seeds, technical know-how and, crucially, a market opportunity for their farm output. This is an important lesson for every developing country.  If we are to ensure that smallholders can produce more food in sustainable ways their farming should be profitable.

Accordingly, scaling up environmentally sustainable farming among smallholders throughout the world will require a reshaping of national policies and the architecture of public and private investment so as to ensure that farmers can learn these techniques, see their value and employ them profitably.

The lesson is simple.  Identify the climate-smart farming practices and techniques that can boost agricultural production, get the relevant know-how to smallholders, support them as they make the transition, and create an enabling policy environment.

If we do this, – and national policies and international development initiatives support a transition to a climate-smart agriculture – we have no doubt that smallholders throughout the world will step up and do their part.

Paul Kagame is President of the Republic of Rwanda. Kanayo F. Nwanze is President of the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), an international financial institution (IFI) and a specialized agency of the United Nations


Originally appeared in Project Syndicate

Pastoralisme durable au #Maroc

Posted by Jeffrey A Brez 0 comments

par Ilaria Firmian


La semaine dernière, j’ai accompagné sur le terrain une visite du Trésor américain au Nord Est du Maroc, qui dans le cadre d’une mission plus vaste voulait aussi voir un exemple opérationnel d’un projet du Fonds de l’Environnement Mondial. Je ne connaissais le Projet de Lutte Participative contre la Désertification et la Réduction de la Pauvreté dans les Hauts Plateaux de l’Oriental que par quelques lectures. J’ai découvert une réalité incroyablement riche en termes d’expériences positives et innovantes.




La visite de terrain a commencé par un déjeuner généreusement offert par nos hôtes à Ain Beni Mathar. Parmi les nombreux mets qui nous furent généreusement offerts, un mouton rôti entier nous a été servi !


Ce mouton symbolise à lui seul l’ histoire des Hauts Plateaux de l’Oriental!


Cette race ovine locale, le Beni Guil, est certifiée IGP («indication géographique protégée»). Le goût particulier de sa viande provient des qualités génétiques de la race mais aussi de l’herbe qui le nourrit, l’Artemisia herba-alba. Cela rends cette race très prisée dans le pays et lui donne une haute valeur marchande. Malheureusement, l’écosystème qui abrite le Beni Guil est de plus en plus en danger.


Les écosystèmes arides et semi arides des Hauts Plateaux de l’Oriental au Maroc subissent une dégradation profonde due au changement climatique (cette année est la troisième année consécutive de sècheresse et 50% de la production céréalière est déjà perdue) et aux mauvaises pratiques de gestion des terres et du cheptel.



Le projet intervient prioritairement dans la gestion durable des terres (GDT) et la gestion intégrée des ressources en eau soit à un niveau politique, en intégrant ces thématiques dans les principaux programmes et initiatives de développement local, soit directement sur le terrain par la construction de micro barrages pour approvisionner les animaux en eau, par la mise en repos des pâturages et par la fixation de dunes.


Ce projet FEM a été conçu en étroite collaboration avec la phase 1 du Projet de Développement des Parcours et de l’élevage dans l’Oriental, soutenu par le FIDA. Ce projet a constitué une base solide pour une intervention consistante sur financement du FEM, et a fourni un cadre institutionnel solide. De plus, il a permis la promotion d’actions innovantes, en particulier la création de coopératives (associations de gestion des pâturages) impliquées dans la totalité des activités du projet, facilitant un haut degré de participation et d’appropriation par les communautés rurales. Une simple visite sur le projet montre le rôle central joué par les éleveurs dans la vie du projet.


Des approches particulièrement innovantes en termes de GDT sont aussi testées, comme par exemple l’utilisation de la charrue Vallerani (un brevet italien) qui permet de créer dans le sol un système de micro-bassins et de sacs enterrés pour recueillir l'eau de pluie et des éléments fertilisants. Ceci favorise la restauration des pâturages dégradés grâce à une meilleure germination et croissance des plantes endogènes mais aussi par la transplantation d'espèces nouvelles préparées en pépinières.


Une autre innovation est l’utilisation dans le processus d’afforestation du produit Zander, un produit biologique provenant de sédiments lacustres, qui contient un éventail de nutriments et hormones de croissance des plantes naturelles stimulant l ’enracinement des plantes et réduisant significativement les besoins en eau.


Le projet a financé aussi l’achat de stations agro-météorologiques automatiques, qui collectent les données nécessaires pour mettre en place un système d’alerte précoce à la sécheresse.


Enfin, pour diminuer la pression sur la terre, le projet promeut des activités génératrices de revenus dont bénéficient principalment les femmes, y compris des circuits d’écotourisme qui suivent le mode de vie des pasteurs nomades.


Ainsi on verra bientôt des touristes parcourir les plateaux, dormir sous la tente, garder des moutons et manger leur délicieuse viande rôtie! et la boucle sera bouclée!

Confianza y Oportunidad en Colombia

Posted by Greg Benchwick Tuesday, April 3, 2012 0 comments

Junta Ejecutiva del FIDA aprueba nuevo préstamo para proyecto de US$70 millones para el desarrollo rural en Colombia
Proyecto de Construcción de Capacidades Empresariales Rurales – Confianza y Oportunidad busca disminuir pobreza extrema y contribuir a la paz


La Junta Ejecutiva del Fondo Internacional de Desarrollo Agrícola (FIDA) aprobó esta semana un nuevo proyecto de 70 millones de dólares estadounidenses para la reducción de la pobreza rural en Colombia.

El Proyecto de Construcción de Capacidades Empresariales Rurales - Confianza y Oportunidad llegará a 160 000 familias en 17 departamentos: Antioquia, Arauca, Bolívar, Caquetá, Cauca, Cesar, Chocó, Córdoba, La Guajira, Magdalena, Meta, Nariño, Putumayo,  Norte de Santander, Sucre, Valle del Cauca y Tolima. La área total comprende 200 000km2, y señaliza un fuerte incremento en el apoyo de la organización especializada de las Naciones Unidas a Colombia.

“El proyecto pretende mejorar la seguridad alimentaria, facilitar acceso a los servicios financieros y comunitarios, mejorar la competitividad e ingresos de pequeños productores en la zona, y crear mecanismos para incluir esta gente en los sistemas de gobernanza”, afirmó Roberto Haudry, Gerente de Programa del País del FIDA en Colombia. “Es una oportunidad invertir en el pueblo Colombiano y tejar nuevas fabricas sociales inclusivas, sostenibles y pacificas”.

El proyecto llegará a 50 000 familias viviendo en la pobreza extrema, y se enfocará en pueblos indígenas, mujeres, comunidades afro-colombianos, jóvenes y familias afectados y desplazados por el conflicto en el país.

“Colombia es un país de ingresos medios. Sin embargo, en el campo Colombiano 7 millones son pobres, 2 millones viven en la pobreza extrema y el 13 por ciento de la población no tiene suficientes ingresos para adquirir la canasta básica de alimentos”, afirmó Haudry.

Con más de 3,6 millones de personas desplazadas internamente, Colombia es el país con mayor número de desplazados en el hemisferio occidental, según el Programa Mundial de Alimentos.

El proyecto será ejecutado por el Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural de Colombia.  Una contribución financiera de 50 millones de dólares estadounidenses viene del FIDA, con 30 millones de dólares estadounidenses de sus recursos propios y 20 millones de dólares estadounidenses de fondos de España.

“Con el nuevo acceso a técnicas, incubadoras de empresas y activos financieros proyectamos un incremento de ingresos de 32 por ciento en la zona de intervención”, afirmó Haudry. “También pretendemos apoyar a 7 000 familias en mejorar sus activos naturales y condiciones ambientales”.

Share It!  


Junta Ejecutiva del FIDA aprueba nuevo préstamo de US$47,5 millones para el desarrollo rural en México
Proyecto de Desarrollo Rural Territorial en la Región Mixteca y la Zona Mazahua busca crear empleos y disminuir la pobreza


La Junta Ejecutiva del Fondo Internacional de Desarrollo Agrícola (FIDA) aprobó esta semana un nuevo proyecto de 47,5 millones de dólares estadounidenses para crear nuevas oportunidades para las familias más pobres de la Región Mixteca y la Zona Mazahua de México  – ubicado en los estados de Guerrero, Oaxaca y Puebla.

“El proyecto ayudará a 30 000 familias de la región a aumentar sus ingresos”, afirmó Enrique Murguía, Coordinador de Proyectos del FIDA en América Central. “También pretende crear oportunidades de empleo – especialmente para jóvenes y mujeres – y fortalecer el tejido social y las economías rurales”.

El proyecto facilitará el acceso al agua domestica para 10 000 hogares.

“Nuestra meta es mejorar la calidad de vida y apoyar las instituciones e instrumentos dedicados a la inclusión social y la paz”, dijo Murguía. “Aunque México es un país de ingresos medios – y la segunda economía más grande de América Latina – todavía tiene una alta tasa de pobreza, violencia y desigualdad”.

Alrededor del 47 por ciento de la población de México es considerada “pobre”, mientras el 18 por ciento de la población no tiene suficientes ingresos para adquirir la canasta básica de alimentos, según el Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social. En el campo mexicano hay más desigualdad y una incidencia marcada de pobreza extrema, especialmente para los pueblos indígenas.

La mayoría de los usuarios del proyecto son indígenas. El proyecto pretende mejorar su inclusión social y sus oportunidades económicas con apoyo al acceso a mercados, capacitación y mecanismos de ahorro.

“Pretendemos ver un incremento de 6,30 dólares estadounidenses de ingresos diarios para las familias usuarias del proyecto”, afirmó Murguía. “El proyecto también tiene un fuerte componente ambiental, y busca mejorar la producción agropecuaria sustentable mediante la rehabilitación de los recursos naturales, la captación de agua para riego y el consumo humano, y la adaptación de nuevas tecnologías. También es importante destacar que 5 000 hectáreas serán reforestadas en la zona”.

El proyecto de seis años de duración será ejecutado por la Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación. Una contribución financiera de 35,7 millones de dólares estadounidenses viene del FIDA – con una donación de 2 millones de dólares, 18,7 millones de dólares estadounidenses de préstamo y 14 millones de dólares estadounidenses del Fondo de Cofinanciación para la Seguridad Alimentaria Español.

El FIDA ha financiado proyectos para reducir la pobreza rural en México durante 30 años con un valor total de cerca de 150 millones de dólares estadounidenses.

Videos



Graph It!


Share It!

Measuring impact in rural Vietnam: IFAD tests a new approach

Posted by Timothy Ledwith Sunday, April 1, 2012 0 comments

Children walk to school in Hoang Su Phi, Viet Nam, in 2002.
Since then, the country has halved poverty overall.
Viet Nam has come a long way since its days as a net importer of food in the early 1980s. Today, following decades of robust growth, it is the world’s second largest exporter of rice. In the past 10 years alone, according to World Bank statistics, it has also halved the proportion of its population living in poverty. Yet inequities persist, especially in remote rural regions where many of the country’s ethnic minority groups live. IFAD continues to support five projects in these areas, working with smallholder farmers to reduce poverty through sustainable agricultural development.

This past week, staff and partners from the IFAD country office in Hanoi joined colleagues at headquarters in Rome by video link. They convened to discuss a newly expanded approach to monitoring and evaluating the impact of IFAD-supported projects in Viet Nam. It was the third in a series of research seminars co-sponsored by IFAD and the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), which has collaborated, as well, on developing this new approach.

The discussion was not without controversy. Still, there was a tangible sense of urgency, on all sides, about stepping up IFAD’s ability to accurately measure results on the ground – not only in Viet Nam but worldwide.

Ambitious target
Thomas Elhaut, IFAD’s Director of Statistics and Studies for Development, moderated the seminar. He began by placing the Viet Nam experience in a broader context: namely, the ambitious target set during the latest replenishment of funding from IFAD member states. The target calls for lifting 80 million rural people out of poverty by 2015.

Without improved evaluation, Elhaut suggested, IFAD will not have the evidence base to design and implement projects that can help reduce poverty on such as large scale. Nor, in the end, will it have the data to credibly report on progress toward the goal of 80 million.

From Hanoi, Atsuko Toda of IFAD and Nicholas Minot of IFPRI went on to describe the approach being tested in Viet Nam and why, in their view, it may hold promise for other countries. The methodology builds upon IFAD’s existing results and impact management system, or RIMS, which has been in use since 2003. By expanding the standardized RIMS household survey, this approach – dubbed “RIMS-plus” – aims to capture more detailed data that is relevant to specific project aims. In another innovation, it uses a control group of households, located outside the target area, to better assess which results are attributable to a project.

Additional indicators
Toda noted that the expanded questionnaire goes beyond the main objectives of the RIMS survey, which were to measure household assets and child nutrition. The RIMS-plus survey, she said, collects information on many additional indicators to diagnose constraints faced by farmers, including limits on access to rural markets, extension services and credit.

Minot added that the designers of the expanded questionnaire have still kept it relatively brief compared to most other household surveys; as a result, it should not overburden either enumerators or respondents.

Regarding the control groups, Minot explained that they would be selected from populations who live near project areas and whose backgrounds and economic status are similar to those of project beneficiaries. “It helps us to adjust for changes in the standard of living outside the project area,” he said. For example, a drought in the same province where a project is under way could cause an overall drop in rural incomes, which would have to be factored into any analysis of the project’s impact.

A third participant in the video link, Nguyen Ngoc Ahn of the Hanoi-based Development and Policies Research Centre, outlined the cost implications of both the extended questionnaire and the use of control groups. The questionnaire increases the amount of time needed to complete each survey and the training needed by enumerators, he said. The control groups add 300 households to the standard RIMS sample of 900 for large projects.

Costs of customization
At this point, some sceptical voices in the audience at IFAD headquarters questioned whether the new methodology’s value justified its added expense. Specifically, they asked whether the control groups could truly mirror the beneficiary households, given the complexities of rural poverty – including gender dynamics. In addition, they wondered whether the benefits of customized household surveys (more project-specific information) outweighed the advantages of standardized questionnaires (lower cost and consistent data across multiple projects).

In response, Toda noted that some of the expenses in Viet Nam represented the one-time cost of researching and developing a new evaluation tool. And while Minot acknowledged that the control groups could not match every household parameter, he maintained that they would provide valuable comparisons with project beneficiaries nonetheless.

On the question of standardized vs. customized surveys, Minot proposed a compromise: “We can use standardized modules but let each country decide which modules are most relevant for them,” he said. Such an arrangement would allow for a degree of customization without adding excessively to costs, he said.

As the seminar wrapped up, Thomas Elhaut praised the presenters in Hanoi for advancing IFAD’s thinking on the design and analysis of agricultural projects, even as various questions remain to be resolved. To some extent, those questions will be answered as the RIMS-plus experiment proceeds in the uplands and deltas of rural Viet Nam, where smallholder farmers need the tools to build a sustainable future.

Watch the recorded webcast of the IFAD-IFPRI seminar: